by Wendy Alton
Paul McCartney is marrying for the third time—this time to Nancy Shevell. Apparently they have known each other for 20 years, and she has independent wealth of her own. Perhaps this is the reason they have announced they are not going to sign any prenuptial agreements. The media has reported that Nancy has signed a one-page document stating that she won’t pursue any of the trust fund money going to Paul’s children. Other than that, no prenuptial agreement. Good or bad?
Prenuptial agreements are agreements made between couples who are planning on getting married. Those agreements will state what happens with their money and property if they ever divorce or die. It can dictate how they will purchase things and how they will share debt. It can indicate whether or not spousal support or alimony will be awarded if they divorce.
Prenuptial agreements are very common when two people are bringing significant assets of their own into the marriage, or even significant debt. They are also common when people are marrying later in life and they have grown children they want to provide for if they were to pass away. They are common with people who are marrying for the 2nd or 3rd time, or for people who have businesses that they have started or have inherited through the family. They are far more common than they used to be.
For couples that are anticipating marriage, it is very important to at least consider whether or not to have a prenuptial agreement in place prior to getting married. This is particularly important if each person has their own property, investments, retirement and savings. If a couple decides on a prenuptial agreement, they must fully disclose to each other all of their property and debt and the value of each, and must agree to consult with an attorney prior to signing it. They are usually signed prior to the wedding.
And yes, they are drafted for people just like you and me, even if we don’t have royalties from Beatles’ songs at stake.
Read the ABC news story here: Paul McCartney Engaged to Nancy Shevell: Third Time Charmed?
If you are interested in learning more about divorce, or have a question about divorce, please call Wendy Alton at 248-380-9976 or email her at walton@fb-firm.com.
Experienced and practical Michigan attorneys solving the problems of business owners, their families, and veterans... one case at a time.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Ninth Circuit Rips Apart VA Over Mental Health Care
by Kristina Derro
Veterans Disability Lawyer
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unleashed its fury on the VA last week in a decision where the judges ruled that the “unchecked incompetence” by the VA had led to poor mental health care and slow processing of disability claims for veterans. Two nonprofit organizations, Veterans United for Truth and Veterans for Common Sense, filed a lawsuit seeking to force VA to make changes to the way it treats veterans with mental health disabilities and handles compensation claims.
The Ninth Circuit agreed with the plaintiffs’ case that the VA must put mental health initiatives into effect throughout the entire system and change the way it adjudicates disability compensation claims in its various regional offices. The Court cited to statistics that it often takes weeks for a suicidal veteran to get a first appointment at a VA and that it often takes VA an average of four years to fully provide the mental health benefits owed to veterans.
During the trial, emails between high-ranking VA officials were entered into evidence, revealing that VA was aware of the high suicide rates among veterans and that it harbored a desire to keep quiet the number of veterans under its care who attempt suicide. The Ninth Circuit opinion stated that “[n]o more veterans should be compelled to agonize or perish while the government fails to perform its obligation”. The Court found that there were no suicide prevention officers at any of the VA’s 800 community-based outpatient clinics, the screening for suicide by the VA was not rigorous, and that 70% of VA medical centers did not have systems to track potentially suicidal veterans.
The Ninth Circuit also wrote a scathing opinion regarding the way VA handled disability compensation claims. The opinion noted that the processing of an initial claim usually took longer than the 120-day goal set by the VA itself, and that regional offices take more than a year to certify appealed claims which the Court found was “a merely ministerial act”. The Court found that no official with VA “was able to provide the court with a sufficient justification for the delays”.
To learn more or to contact a Veterans disability lawyer, Veterans disability attorney, Veterans lawyer, or Veterans attorney call 1.800.693.4800 or visit Legalhelpforveterans.com
Veterans Disability Lawyer
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unleashed its fury on the VA last week in a decision where the judges ruled that the “unchecked incompetence” by the VA had led to poor mental health care and slow processing of disability claims for veterans. Two nonprofit organizations, Veterans United for Truth and Veterans for Common Sense, filed a lawsuit seeking to force VA to make changes to the way it treats veterans with mental health disabilities and handles compensation claims.
The Ninth Circuit agreed with the plaintiffs’ case that the VA must put mental health initiatives into effect throughout the entire system and change the way it adjudicates disability compensation claims in its various regional offices. The Court cited to statistics that it often takes weeks for a suicidal veteran to get a first appointment at a VA and that it often takes VA an average of four years to fully provide the mental health benefits owed to veterans.
During the trial, emails between high-ranking VA officials were entered into evidence, revealing that VA was aware of the high suicide rates among veterans and that it harbored a desire to keep quiet the number of veterans under its care who attempt suicide. The Ninth Circuit opinion stated that “[n]o more veterans should be compelled to agonize or perish while the government fails to perform its obligation”. The Court found that there were no suicide prevention officers at any of the VA’s 800 community-based outpatient clinics, the screening for suicide by the VA was not rigorous, and that 70% of VA medical centers did not have systems to track potentially suicidal veterans.
The Ninth Circuit also wrote a scathing opinion regarding the way VA handled disability compensation claims. The opinion noted that the processing of an initial claim usually took longer than the 120-day goal set by the VA itself, and that regional offices take more than a year to certify appealed claims which the Court found was “a merely ministerial act”. The Court found that no official with VA “was able to provide the court with a sufficient justification for the delays”.
To learn more or to contact a Veterans disability lawyer, Veterans disability attorney, Veterans lawyer, or Veterans attorney call 1.800.693.4800 or visit Legalhelpforveterans.com
Monday, May 16, 2011
The iPhone Divorce App: Will it Make Divorce Lawyers Extinct?
by Wendy Alton
There is no doubt that the iPhone offers significant advantages to cell phone users with the hundreds, if not thousands, of apps (applications) that you can download and use. You can use your iPhone to read on the (free) Kindle, rent movies, check local gas prices, plan your workouts and download coupons, just to name a few. You can truly personalize your phone to your own life. Now, it appears you can also download apps to help you through your divorce.
A Dallas Texas family law attorney created 2 divorce apps for the iPhone: one that focuses on the cost and preparation for a divorce, and the other for splitting assets. You can review these apps here: DivorceApps.com.
You can also download another divorce app called the “Divorce Encyclopedia,” which can be found here: 3stepdivorce.com.
Without looking at the apps themselves it is difficult to tell how effective or educational they may be. I typically advise my clients to read anything online with skepticism, because only a Michigan family law attorney truly understands how the court will handle your divorce issues. That being said, there are valuable websites that offer a wealth of credible information. Perhaps apps will do that as well.
So, are the apps worth it? I don’t know—I have a Droid phone. I guess I’ll have to buy an iPhone to know for sure!
If you are interested in learning more about divorce, or have a question about divorce, please call Wendy Alton at 248-380-9976 or email her at walton@fb-firm.com.
There is no doubt that the iPhone offers significant advantages to cell phone users with the hundreds, if not thousands, of apps (applications) that you can download and use. You can use your iPhone to read on the (free) Kindle, rent movies, check local gas prices, plan your workouts and download coupons, just to name a few. You can truly personalize your phone to your own life. Now, it appears you can also download apps to help you through your divorce.
A Dallas Texas family law attorney created 2 divorce apps for the iPhone: one that focuses on the cost and preparation for a divorce, and the other for splitting assets. You can review these apps here: DivorceApps.com.
You can also download another divorce app called the “Divorce Encyclopedia,” which can be found here: 3stepdivorce.com.
Without looking at the apps themselves it is difficult to tell how effective or educational they may be. I typically advise my clients to read anything online with skepticism, because only a Michigan family law attorney truly understands how the court will handle your divorce issues. That being said, there are valuable websites that offer a wealth of credible information. Perhaps apps will do that as well.
So, are the apps worth it? I don’t know—I have a Droid phone. I guess I’ll have to buy an iPhone to know for sure!
If you are interested in learning more about divorce, or have a question about divorce, please call Wendy Alton at 248-380-9976 or email her at walton@fb-firm.com.
Friday, May 13, 2011
Parenting Time: Are Courts Biased?
by Wendy Alton
Parenting time is the legal term used in divorce for the specific schedule that each parent has with their children. Two recent studies conducted by Arizona State University raise some questions about whether the family courts are biased in their awards of parenting time.
I blogged last week about the parenting time schedule that the Wayne County Circuit (Family) Court recently implemented. Effective this year, parents that have a judgment or order that specifies “reasonable parenting time” will be bound by the court’s schedule, found here: Wayne County Circuit Court Co-Parenting Plan. Interestingly, the Co-Parenting Plan establishes parenting time plans time based upon the child’s age. Even a brief review of the Co-Parenting Plan reveals that in no way does it provide for equal time for both parents. The Co-Parenting Plan provides the non-custodial parent (usually dad) overnights on an every-other weekend basis, with one overnight each week.
However, the studies conducted and summarized here, Public Support Rising for Joint Custody, reveal that there is an incredible growing public support for equal time for both parents. Equal time was preferred in these studies even in high-conflict situations. The participants of the study made mock decisions as a judge in custody disputes, and overwhelmingly granted equal time to the mother and father. The studies reveal that the public believes that courts favor mom, and that the courts should instead be giving equal time with the children to both mom and dad.
The law in Michigan regarding parenting time states that “It is presumed to be in the best interests of a child for the child to have a strong relationship with both of his or her parents… parenting time shall be granted to a parent in a frequency, duration, and type reasonably calculated to promote a strong relationship.” MCL 722.27a. Many believe that this goes hand-in-hand with giving mom and dad equal time with the children. Many believe that the enforcement of cookie-cutter parenting time guidelines or even the Wayne County Co-Parenting Plan does not promote a strong relationship between the parents and their children.
It will be interesting to see how the courts respond to the growing public demand for equal parenting time, especially in light of recent parenting time guidelines that generally favor mom.
Lesson to learn? If you are going through a divorce and you are unsatisfied with the court’s parenting time plan, make sure that you or your attorney negotiate the specific time that you want time with your children. Agree on a schedule that works for the best of your own family.
If you are interested in learning more about divorce, or have a question about divorce, please call Wendy Alton at 248-380-9976 or email her at walton@fb-firm.com.
Parenting time is the legal term used in divorce for the specific schedule that each parent has with their children. Two recent studies conducted by Arizona State University raise some questions about whether the family courts are biased in their awards of parenting time.
I blogged last week about the parenting time schedule that the Wayne County Circuit (Family) Court recently implemented. Effective this year, parents that have a judgment or order that specifies “reasonable parenting time” will be bound by the court’s schedule, found here: Wayne County Circuit Court Co-Parenting Plan. Interestingly, the Co-Parenting Plan establishes parenting time plans time based upon the child’s age. Even a brief review of the Co-Parenting Plan reveals that in no way does it provide for equal time for both parents. The Co-Parenting Plan provides the non-custodial parent (usually dad) overnights on an every-other weekend basis, with one overnight each week.
However, the studies conducted and summarized here, Public Support Rising for Joint Custody, reveal that there is an incredible growing public support for equal time for both parents. Equal time was preferred in these studies even in high-conflict situations. The participants of the study made mock decisions as a judge in custody disputes, and overwhelmingly granted equal time to the mother and father. The studies reveal that the public believes that courts favor mom, and that the courts should instead be giving equal time with the children to both mom and dad.
The law in Michigan regarding parenting time states that “It is presumed to be in the best interests of a child for the child to have a strong relationship with both of his or her parents… parenting time shall be granted to a parent in a frequency, duration, and type reasonably calculated to promote a strong relationship.” MCL 722.27a. Many believe that this goes hand-in-hand with giving mom and dad equal time with the children. Many believe that the enforcement of cookie-cutter parenting time guidelines or even the Wayne County Co-Parenting Plan does not promote a strong relationship between the parents and their children.
It will be interesting to see how the courts respond to the growing public demand for equal parenting time, especially in light of recent parenting time guidelines that generally favor mom.
Lesson to learn? If you are going through a divorce and you are unsatisfied with the court’s parenting time plan, make sure that you or your attorney negotiate the specific time that you want time with your children. Agree on a schedule that works for the best of your own family.
If you are interested in learning more about divorce, or have a question about divorce, please call Wendy Alton at 248-380-9976 or email her at walton@fb-firm.com.
Thursday, May 12, 2011
New Beginning for Board of Water Commissioners
by Jim Fausone
The new Detroit Board of Water Commissioners took office on April 1, 2011. The new board structure was conceived as a settlement for long-standing litigation about the operations of Detroit Water and Sewage Department (DWSD).
Mayor Dave Bing is trying to get Detroit out from federal oversight of the Water and Sewage Department and the Police Department. As a member of the new board, I can attest to the board’s desire to identify and correct historical deficiencies in the governance and operation of DWSD.
To read about Mayor Bing’s plans, see the attached article from the Wall Street Journal.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704322804576303881213466512.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
The new Detroit Board of Water Commissioners took office on April 1, 2011. The new board structure was conceived as a settlement for long-standing litigation about the operations of Detroit Water and Sewage Department (DWSD).
Mayor Dave Bing is trying to get Detroit out from federal oversight of the Water and Sewage Department and the Police Department. As a member of the new board, I can attest to the board’s desire to identify and correct historical deficiencies in the governance and operation of DWSD.
To read about Mayor Bing’s plans, see the attached article from the Wall Street Journal.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704322804576303881213466512.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Veteran & Military Health Care Costs
by Jim Fausone
Veteran Disability Lawyer
Have you noticed that when the national press talks about the cost of war it ignores the medical costs associated with the military and veterans? The VA budget is a reminder of the prolonged cost of war. A recent analysis of the DOD budget also drives this home.
Costs of the program that provides health coverage to some 10 million active duty personnel, retirees, reservists and their families have jumped from $19 billion in 2001 to $53 billion in the Pentagon's latest budget request. These costs are driving the President to suggest that veterans and those using TRICARE pay more for their health care. The Detroit News reports: "After years of resisting proposed increases for the military men and women who sacrificed for a nation, budget-conscious lawmakers suddenly are poised to make them pay a bit more for their health care."
The current TRICARE fees, unchanged in 11 years, are just $230 a year for an individual and $460 for a family. That's far less than what civilian federal workers pay for health care, about $5,000 a year. If this increase is passed on to retirees, you should expect pressure on VA to continue to raise the costs passed on to veterans.
We will have to remind Washington that the veterans are a unique group that gave the country the best years of their lives and should not now be asked to again bear the burdens of the country. Those who have never sacrificed for the country should do more - not the retirees and veterans.
From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20110509/NATION/105090339/Health-care-for-military-reaches-$53-billion#ixzz1Lsxqplu5
To learn more or to contact a Veterans disability lawyer, Veterans disability attorney, Veterans lawyer, or Veterans attorney call 1.800.693.4800 or visit Legalhelpforveterans.com
Veteran Disability Lawyer
Have you noticed that when the national press talks about the cost of war it ignores the medical costs associated with the military and veterans? The VA budget is a reminder of the prolonged cost of war. A recent analysis of the DOD budget also drives this home.
Costs of the program that provides health coverage to some 10 million active duty personnel, retirees, reservists and their families have jumped from $19 billion in 2001 to $53 billion in the Pentagon's latest budget request. These costs are driving the President to suggest that veterans and those using TRICARE pay more for their health care. The Detroit News reports: "After years of resisting proposed increases for the military men and women who sacrificed for a nation, budget-conscious lawmakers suddenly are poised to make them pay a bit more for their health care."
The current TRICARE fees, unchanged in 11 years, are just $230 a year for an individual and $460 for a family. That's far less than what civilian federal workers pay for health care, about $5,000 a year. If this increase is passed on to retirees, you should expect pressure on VA to continue to raise the costs passed on to veterans.
We will have to remind Washington that the veterans are a unique group that gave the country the best years of their lives and should not now be asked to again bear the burdens of the country. Those who have never sacrificed for the country should do more - not the retirees and veterans.
From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20110509/NATION/105090339/Health-care-for-military-reaches-$53-billion#ixzz1Lsxqplu5
To learn more or to contact a Veterans disability lawyer, Veterans disability attorney, Veterans lawyer, or Veterans attorney call 1.800.693.4800 or visit Legalhelpforveterans.com
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Detroit Divorce TV
by Wendy Alton
The Michigan Film Office has just approved film incentives for a pilot courtroom reality TV show: “Domestic Justice.” The TV show is described as an “explosive new judicial reality show” where “real life drama meets common sense justice.” The episodes will involve domestic disputes involving custody and parenting time, but also bullying and harassment. The justice will be administered by Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Vonda Evans.
So is this going to be another Judge Judy show? A close look at the TV show’s website may provide an answer to this: Domestic Justice. It appears that the unique twist of Domestic Justice is that it will employ short-term and long-term counseling and therapy supervision for the participants, and appears that the focus of the “justice” will be on finding resolutions that integrate on-going counseling for everyone involved. The goal is also to provide follow-up segments to track the progress of the people involved in the dispute.
Do you have an issue that you want to submit for “common sense justice?” If so, the website Domestic Justice provides you with a list of questions to answer, and if your issue is relevant to the show, a submission form for you to fill out.
Keep posted for more details—and read more on MLive’s website: Michigan Film Office approves Detroit-filmed judge show for incentives.
If you are interested in learning more about divorce, or have a question about divorce, please call Wendy Alton at 248-380-9976 or email her at walton@fb-firm.com.
The Michigan Film Office has just approved film incentives for a pilot courtroom reality TV show: “Domestic Justice.” The TV show is described as an “explosive new judicial reality show” where “real life drama meets common sense justice.” The episodes will involve domestic disputes involving custody and parenting time, but also bullying and harassment. The justice will be administered by Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Vonda Evans.
So is this going to be another Judge Judy show? A close look at the TV show’s website may provide an answer to this: Domestic Justice. It appears that the unique twist of Domestic Justice is that it will employ short-term and long-term counseling and therapy supervision for the participants, and appears that the focus of the “justice” will be on finding resolutions that integrate on-going counseling for everyone involved. The goal is also to provide follow-up segments to track the progress of the people involved in the dispute.
Do you have an issue that you want to submit for “common sense justice?” If so, the website Domestic Justice provides you with a list of questions to answer, and if your issue is relevant to the show, a submission form for you to fill out.
Keep posted for more details—and read more on MLive’s website: Michigan Film Office approves Detroit-filmed judge show for incentives.
If you are interested in learning more about divorce, or have a question about divorce, please call Wendy Alton at 248-380-9976 or email her at walton@fb-firm.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)