Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Veterans Disability Attorney Comments on Shrinking Disability Benefits Backlog

In an address to disabled veterans, President Obama announced that the backlog of disability claims was shrinking. At the Disabled American Veterans annual meeting earlier this year, Obama stated that the backlog of disability benefits claims had shrink by as much as 20 percent in the past five months. But, he conceded, a new wave of claims was coming in to the Veterans Administration. Some of those claims are from service members who served in Vietnam and are looking for care for ailments they believe stem from their decades-past exposure to Agent Orange, as well as veterans most recently returned from Iraq and Afghanistan with traumatic brain injuries, post-traumatic stress disorder and physical injuries.
"Any efforts to decrease the extensive backlog of disability claims are greatly needed and appreciated," commented James Fausone, a veterans disability attorney. "Many of the service members who have filed disability claims have been waiting for a shockingly long time just to get their claims processed, much less disbursed."
The White House is committed to boosting the amount of spending available for vet services to attend to their education and job prospects as well as the physical and mental health and homeless issues so many vets face, Obama said. There is also a push to better support additional hiring of vets at the Department of Veterans Affairs, and increase overtime pay to clear up the backlog of claims.
According to the VA, 64 percent of claims still pending are supplemental claims filed by vets asking for additional benefits. Though the sequestration cuts took effect in March 2013, veteran spending was exempted, allowing funding to go to decreasing the countless disability benefits currently backlogged at the VA.  Obama stated that Congress needed to work together to reduce the deficit and to keep the promises of support ad benefits to veterans.   
Though World War I's last U.S. veteran died more than two years ago, Obama said to the 34,000 attendees, survivor benefits are still going to the descendants of the men who fought then, and in the Spanish-American War. Benefits are even going to a Civil War veteran's daughter. Benefits will also be going to the descendants of this wave of service people. 
Source

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Michigan Supreme Court Provides Judges & Attorneys With Online Child Protection Toolkit


Melissa Cox, Esq.

A new online toolkit is complete to assist judges and lawyers in handling child protection cases.

The kit offers information about hearings at various stages and includes a description of the hearing.  It also provides applicable court rules and statutes, bench cards, recommended court forms, links to training videos and other training materials, administrative memos and other resources.

The kit sets forth detailed guidelines for judges to follow when determining either to order reunification of the child and parents(s) or to order an alternative permanent home setting for the child.

The toolkit is created by the Child Welfare Services Division of the Supreme Court Administrative Office and can be found here.


If you have any questions regarding Child Protective Service Proceedings, please contact Melissa Cox at 248-380-0000 or mcox@fb-firm.com.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Lost War Records Again

Jim Fausone
Veteran Disability Lawyer

 
In every conflict, the records of the chaos of war become lost or destroyed.  This is as expected as multiple versions of success and failure in the field.  However, for veterans, the loss of records have the opportunity to damage their claims for veteran benefits. Will they be able to prove to VA that a unit event took place or a hostile action was encountered.

ProPublica and the Seattle Times uncovered assessments by the Army’s Center of Military History [4] showing that scores of units lacked adequate records. Others had wiped them off computer hard drives amid confusion about whether classified materials could be transferred home.

The missing records do not include personnel files and medical records, which are stored separately from the field records that detail day-to-day activities.

VA should not punish the veteran in these situations.
http://www.propublica.org/article/army-says-war-records-gap-is-real-launches-recovery-effort

Friday, September 6, 2013

USAF AO Shame

Jim Fausone
Veteran Disability Lawyer


Those veterans who flew on C-123 airplanes dropped more than 10 million gallons of Agent Orange to destroy enemy cover and crops during the Vietnam War.  After the war between 1972 and 1982, about 1,500 men and women served aboard 34 C-123s that were previously deployed in Operation Ranch Hand, a large-scale defoliation mission in Vietnam and other countries in Southeast Asia. VA does not recognize AO exposure onboard the C-123s during or after the Vietnam war. If the veteran can prove boots on the ground during the war he can establish AO exposure.  However, those who were exposed outside the country or after the war by residuals from the C-123s are not as fortunate.  Spreading the word among scientists, veterans and politicians and posting evidence publicly at c123kcancer.blogspot.com is one way to keep this in the public eye even as veterans pass away. 

Just as the Navy and VA have shame for how they treat Blue Water Navy vets, the USAF has shame for its treatment of C-123 crews.
 

 

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Embezzlement Law in Michigan


Mark Mandell, Esq.

 
Recently, a Portage, Michigan man was sentenced to 87 months in prison for embezzling $6.5 million from the company where he worked as a comptroller.  In addition to his prison time and supervised release thereafter, he is required to pay restitution of $6.5 million to his former employer.  This shows just how serious the consequences of an embezzlement conviction can be.
 
Embezzlement in Michigan is governed by statute – MCL §750.174.  In essence, a person is guilty of embezzlement when they are in a relationship of trust to the principal (generally an employer-employee situation); in lawful possession or control of the funds of the principal; and wrongfully take or convert those funds to his own use, with the intent to defraud.

The key element to a charge of embezzlement is that the person takes the money, which belongs to the principal, with the intent to convert it to his own use.  In other words, the person has the fraudulent intent to deprive the owner of his property and take it for himself.  Without this intent to defraud, a taking cannot be embezzlement (though it may constitute another offense.)

The severity of an embezzlement charge depends on the amount of money or personal property taken by the agent or employee.  The charges include the following: 

·        If the money or property taken is valued at less than $200, the charge is a 93-day  misdemeanor with a possible fine up to $500; 

·        If the value is up to $1,000, the crime is a 1-year misdemeanor subject to a fine of up to $2,000.

·         $1,000 to $20,000 is a 5-year felony with a fine of up to $10,000. 

·         $20,000 to $50,000 is a 10-year felony with a fine up to $15,000. 

·         $50,000 to $100,000 is a 15-year felony with a fine up to $25,000. 

·         $100,000 and above is a 20-year felony with a fine up to $50,000.

Additionally, a person convicted of embezzlement will likely be required to pay restitution to the owner of the amount illegally taken, in addition to the statutory fines and jail time.  Charges may also be enhanced if the defendant has any prior embezzlement convictions on his record.

If you are facing embezzlement charges, or if you need more information about this area of the law, contact Michigan Fraud Lawyer Mark Mandell at (248) 380-0000 or online at www.MichiganFraudLawyer.com.  Mr. Mandell can provide you the experienced and knowledgeable legal counsel that is absolutely imperative when facing all manners of criminal charges.

 

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Veterans Skype Therapy

Kristina Derro
Veterans Disability Lawyer

 
Unfortunately, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an all too common condition for soldiers returning home after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Many veterans choose to seek counseling to cope with this and other effects of their service overseas.

Recently, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began a program by which these therapy sessions are conducted over the internet.  The veterans can see and interact with their counselor through a video-chat program such as Skype or Cisco Jabber.
 
In the long term, veterans using this “Skype therapy” progressed at the same rate as veterans receiving traditional face-to-face therapy.  Traditional therapy is never going away – but this new online therapy is only going to get bigger. 

Of course, there can be technical problems with online therapy such as pixilation, choppiness, and freezing.  If the internet connection is lost, that will end the session.  In one case, a study found that a therapist did not notice for three sessions that his patient was in a wheelchair.  Some also believe that this new approach will decrease empathy because the therapist is unable to shake the patient’s hand, hand tissue to a crying patient, or otherwise physically interact with the patient.

Even with the drawbacks, this new approach is certainly a blessing for veterans who do not live near a VA hospital or clinic.  These veterans will now have the ability to get the treatment they need from the comfort of their own home.

If you have questions about PTSD or benefits for veterans, contact Legal Help For Veterans, a practice group of Fausone Bohn, LLP, at 800-693-4800 or online at www.legalhelpforveterans.com. 

To learn more about the VA’s new online therapy program, please visit: http://www.stripes.com/news/veterans/skype-therapy-it-s-working-for-veterans-1.229089#.Udg7dhg-uZk.gmail

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Veterans Disability Attorney Fausone Notes Pentagon's Proposal of New Steps In Light of Military Sexual Assaults

The Pentagon has announced new plans to shore up protection for victims of sexual assault, more closely control the behavior of both recruiters and trainers, and track sexual assault complaints.

"Steps to protect our troops from any unwanted sexual advances and assaultive behaviors are to be commended," stated James Fausone, a veterans disability attorney.

Steps include better enforcement of policies which prohibit inappropriate relationships, establishing an advocacy group within each service branch for victims which provides representation and legal advice for those with complaints of sexual assault, and disqualifying troop members who have backgrounds including sexual assault from roles as counselors, instructors or recruiters.

Meanwhile, an airman who was assigned to the Air Force Academy was convicted in August of aggravated sexual conduct at a general court martial against his fellow female airman.

The airman received a sentence of 15 months confinement. He was also reduced in grade to airman basic, and he was dishonorably discharged by a panel of officers. The conviction was just the latest in a series of high-profile military sexual assault cases as the Defense Department and Congress attempt to determine the best way to prosecute sexual assault cases and if a commanded should be included in proceedings.  

The now-former chief of the Air Force Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Branch, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Krusinski, was arrested easier this year after allegedly committing sexual battery against a woman not far from the Pentagon after exiting a strip club. The ensuing fallout has thrown a harsh spotlight on sexual assault and misconduct against fellow officers in all branches of the service. Krusinski's post is now helmed by a woman who had been hired to investigate the assault by trainers of female recruits in Texas, at Lackland Air Force Base.

The Defense Department is currently looking at how to expand an Air Force program which offers special counsel to service members who allege that they are the victims of unwanted sexual conduct or sexual assault or unwanted sexual contact. 

There were an estimated 26,000 unwanted sexual contact incidents in 2012 experienced by active-duty troops.   

Sources